Canada’s Supreme Court Backs Indigenous Rights in Dispute over Yukon Wilderness

Photo: Archemdisblog

 

In a victory for indigenous groups, Canada’s Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Yukon territorial government could not rewrite a plan to protect a vast stretch of wilderness because a joint indigenous-government commission had already agreed to it.

In trying to revise the plan, the court said in a unanimous ruling, the territorial government violated 30-year-old treaties between the government and indigenous groups, which gave those groups a role in deciding how their traditional lands should be managed.

The decision marks the end of a long legal fight between indigenous First Nations and the Yukon government over the fate of 26,000 miles of the Peel Watershed, a pristine region of mountains and rivers that also has huge deposits of coal, gas and minerals.

The decision will have broad ramifications for Canada’s indigenous reconciliation efforts, said Gordon Christie, a professor of aboriginal law at the University of British Columbia.

“This case sends a signal that governments need to abide by modern treaties they’ve signed,” he said. The joint commission, which was made up of appointees from the First Nations and the Yukon government, spent seven years negotiating with both sides before presenting a final recommendation in 2011 to set aside 80 percent of the wilderness for conservation, with the rest allotted for road construction and resource extraction. But in 2014, the Yukon government rejected the commission’s plan and adopted its own version, which would have opened more than two-thirds of the area to industrial development.

The First Nations, joined by two environmental groups, filed a lawsuit, arguing that the government had violated its treaty obligations and must accept the commission’s final recommendation. Two lower courts ruled in their favor but disagreed over whether the government could rewind negotiations for a better deal.

In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Yukon government had acted in bad faith, and can only approve, reject or modify the commission’s final recommendation after further consultations with indigenous groups.

“Yukon’s changes to the Final Recommended Plan did not respect the land use planning process in the Final Agreements and its conduct was not becoming of the honor of the Crown,” the court said, referring to the Canadian government.

 

Source :

NYTimes

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


13 − three =